Hoard, however, is exactly the same as it was in the previous version: not working. It starts failing allocations with about 350 megs allocated, for reasons that can only be described as Outer Limitsish. At 350 megs, my virtual address space is nowhere near full, nor is my physical memory or virtual memory. Yet the author of Hoard swears that Hoard will not fail unless it runs out of memory. The answer turned out to be the weirdest of both worlds.
This is what WinDbg (may I just say that I loathe that stupid program) has to say about the memory state of the program, at the point of the crash (due to new returning NULL and it getting accessed):
-------------------- State SUMMARY --------------------------Okay, so the quantities of committed, free, and reserved memory are about what you'd expect (actually, I would have expected reserved memory would have been a lot higher, but that's relatively unimportant). The real WTF is that last line. When I first saw that, I thought it had to be BS. With 372,224 KB allocated/reserved, the worst-case scenario would be that an equal amount of memory would be diced into 64 KB blocks (this would be one 64 KB allocation unit being committed/reserved, the next free, etc.). That would leave about 65% of the address space completely free, and the largest free block size should be a few orders of magnitude larger than 64 KB.
TotSize ( KB) Pct(Tots) Usage
16507000 ( 365596) : 17.43% : MEM_COMMIT
69470000 ( 1724864) : 82.25% : MEM_FREE
679000 ( 6628) : 00.32% : MEM_RESERVE
Largest free region: Base 00000000 - Size 00010000 (64 KB)
Nevertheless, here's what WinDbg has to say about the virtual address space (a little fragment of it):
68362000 : 68362000 - 0000e000
Type 00000000
Protect 00000001 PAGE_NOACCESS
State 00010000 MEM_FREE
Usage RegionUsageFree
68372000 : 68372000 - 0000e000
Type 00000000
Protect 00000001 PAGE_NOACCESS
State 00010000 MEM_FREE
Usage RegionUsageFree
68382000 : 68382000 - 0000e000
Type 00000000
Protect 00000001 PAGE_NOACCESS
State 00010000 MEM_FREE
Usage RegionUsageFree
68392000 : 68392000 - 0000e000
Type 00000000
Protect 00000001 PAGE_NOACCESS
State 00010000 MEM_FREE
Usage RegionUsageFree
683a2000 : 683a2000 - 0000e000
Type 00000000
Protect 00000001 PAGE_NOACCESS
State 00010000 MEM_FREE
Usage RegionUsageFree
683b2000 : 683b2000 - 0000e000
Type 00000000
Protect 00000001 PAGE_NOACCESS
State 00010000 MEM_FREE
Usage RegionUsageFree
683c2000 : 683c2000 - 0000e000
Type 00000000
Protect 00000001 PAGE_NOACCESS
State 00010000 MEM_FREE
Usage RegionUsageFree
And on it goes, for hundreds of pages. This is just mind-boggling: all these blocks of free space smaller than 64 KB. Querying WinDbg confirms what seems probable from this list: in between each of those blocks are a couple pages of allocated memory.
For those not familiar with Windows memory allocation, there are two levels of allocation: reserve and commit. Reserve reserves a region of the address space, preventing it from being used to allocate memory unless you explicitly tell Windows to allocate from that region. Commit allocates actual memory to the region - either physical memory, or space in the page file. This allows you to, for example, reserve a huge contiguous block of memory for a buffer, but only allocate it as you actually need the memory (e.g. realloc).
Now, reserving is done by the allocation unit, which is usually 64 KB. This means that you must reserve starting at a 64 KB boundary, and reserve some size that is a multiple of 64 KB. Committing is done by the page size - usually 4 KB (note that you can only commit memory out of a reserved region, although you can do both in one system call). That means you can have a 64 KB block that is partially committed and partially reserved. I know of no way to have 8 KB of a 64 KB block committed, and the other 56 KB not reserved (at least not from user mode), and I have absolutely no idea how Hoard has managed to accomplish this. But at least I know what the problem is, so I can get them to fix it.
No comments:
Post a Comment